Skip to main content
The University of Massachusetts Amherst

Bird response to future climate and forest management focused on mitigating climate change

Authors:

Jaymi LeBrun

Jeffrey Schneiderman

Frank Thompson

William Dijak

Jacob Fraser

Hong He

Joshua Millspaugh

Publication Type:
Journal Article
Year of Publication:
2016
Secondary Title:
Landscape Ecology
ISSN:
0921-2973
DOI:
10.1007/s10980-016-0463-x
Pages:
1-18
Year:
2016
Date:
Nov-18-2016
URL:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007\%2Fs10980-016-0463-x

Abstract

Global temperatures are projected to increase and affect forests and wildlife populations. Forest management can potentially mitigate climate-induced changes through promoting carbon sequestration, forest resilience, and facilitated change. We modeled direct and indirect effects of climate change on avian abundance through changes in forest landscapes and assessed impacts on bird abundances of forest management strategies designed to mitigate climate change effects. We coupled a Bayesian hierarchical model with a spatially explicit landscape simulation model (LANDIS PRO) to predict avian relative abundance. We considered multiple climate scenarios and forest management scenarios focused on carbon sequestration, forest resilience, and facilitated change over 100 years. Management had a greater impact on avian abundance (almost 50% change under some scenarios) than climate (<3% change) and only early successional and coniferous forest showed significant change in percent cover across time. The northern bobwhite was the only species that changed in abundance due to climate-induced changes in vegetation. Northern bobwhite, prairie warbler, and blue-winged warbler generally increased in response to warming temperatures but prairie warbler exhibited a non-linear response and began to decline as summer maximum temperatures exceeded 36 \textdegreeC at the end of the century. Linking empirical models with process-based landscape change models can be an effective way to predict climate change and management impacts on wildlife, but time frames greater than 100 years may be required to see climate related effects. We suggest that future research carefully consider species-specific effects and interactions between management and climate.